Qwen3 32B vs Tencent HY3
qwen/qwen3-32b · tencent/hy3
As of November 1, 2026, Qwen3 32B is the cheaper API on UberLLM: $0.0008 per million input tokens and $0.0028 per million output, versus $0.0012 / $0.0050 for Tencent HY3, about 44% less when output is 3 tokens for every input token. These are the best prices on the market right now. Both work with one OpenAI-compatible key and UberLLM adds no fee. Choose Qwen3 32B to cut cost; choose Tencent HY3 when context size wins. Tencent HY3 carries the larger context window (262,144 vs 32,000 tokens), which can matter for long-document work.
Qwen3 32B vs Tencent HY3, side by side
| Spec | Qwen3 32B | Tencent HY3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price · input / 1M | $0.0008 | $0.0012 |
| Price · output / 1M | $0.0028 | $0.0050 |
| Context length | 32,000 | 262,144 |
| Max output tokens | 8,000 | 131,072 |
| Input modalities | text | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Tools / functions | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | — | Yes |
| % off list | 99% off | 99.1% off |
Best prices on UberLLM right now. No UberLLM fee on requests; adding credit by card costs 5.5% + $0.50. Updated November 1, 2026. A price more than 70% below list is what buyers were billed, not an error. Why so cheap?
Qwen3 32B vs Tencent HY3 — FAQ
Is Qwen3 32B or Tencent HY3 cheaper?
Qwen3 32B is cheaper on a blended token mix, by about 44%. A request costs what its provider charged, UberLLM adds no fee, and every request is listed with its cost in Activity.
What's the price difference between Qwen3 32B and Tencent HY3?
Qwen3 32B: $0.0008 in / $0.0028 out per 1M tokens. Tencent HY3: $0.0012 in / $0.0050 out per 1M tokens. That's roughly a 44% blended difference. Prices are live; UberLLM adds no fee.
Can I use both Qwen3 32B and Tencent HY3 with one API?
Yes. Both are served through a single OpenAI-compatible endpoint — set the base URL to https://api.uberllm.dev/v1 and your UberLLM key, then switch between them by changing the model id. Anthropic SDKs work via https://api.uberllm.dev/v1/messages.